I don't quite blame them for giving up, being rude, and in Hilda's case being selfish and refusing to ask for help from the Hylians.Īnyways as for Ravio, I actually think those circumstances really affected why he did what he did. Their world was dying, the people knew it was dying, and there was really nothing anyone could do about it because the royal family destroyed the only thing that could save it (until Hilda discovered there were alternate dimensions with Triforces of their own). As soon as their Triforce destroyed itself, their world started to decay, and people close to the Triforce lost their representative virtues. Her ancestors thought it was a good idea to destroy the Triforce because it was getting problematic with the number of people wanting it and causing chaos, only to find out that it was something that bound their world to reality.
Yes, that's pretty much what Hilda explains. On the other side of things, in the end, for the sake of saving your nation/world/species/whatever, would it really be right to sacrifice other nations/worlds/species/whatevers when there is seeminly no option and therefore "not be a traitor"? So we have that our main character (Link) is from Hyrule, so it makes sense that we don't want his world to be destroyed but what if we were to see things from another perspective? What if we played as a character in Ravio's situation, trying to stop the ones in charge from saving his/her/our own world because it would mean the destruction of another world and that's not right? Would it be justifiable, or would people dismiss the character for being a "traitor", as it happens for example with movies like 'Avatar' and 'Star Trek: Insurrection'? Would it be right to simply expect there "to be another way"? The destruction of Lorule, needless to say, also comes with the death of all its inhabitants who are the responsability of Zelda and Ravio (and that we get to know throughout the game). So after Hilda is convinced and they return Link and Zelda to Hyrule with their Triforce, Hilda and Ravio are left with the idea that their world is most likely going to get destroyed now (they didn't know of nor did they expect Link's and Zelda's wish) but at least they did what they believe was moraly right (not detroying Hyrule to save Lorule).
So Ravio wanted to stop Princess Hilda from stealing Hyrule's Triforce, since doing so would cause the destruction of Hyrule, and she would be repeating the mistakes of their ancestors, so it was wrong.īut the reason Hilda wanted to steal Hyrule's Triforce was because the one of Lorule was destroyed, wich in turm led to Lorule's slow paced destruction and as much as Ravio insists that "there has to be another way", neither he nor Hilda know of one, he doesn't offer any idea himself either. I'm going right into the ending of the game, so don't keep reading if you don't want it spoiled.
0 kommentar(er)
